
Starred, directed and produced by Clint Eastwood, The Mule tells the story of an 80-year-old horticulturist facing financial problems, who becomes a ‘mule’, a person that transports cocaine for a drug cartel.
The premise is simple, yet the screenwriter Nick Schenk (Gran Torino) could’ve taken many different routes for the story and, in my opinion, took the best one.
The structure of the story is based around runs. Each time Clint’s character goes on a ‘mission’, something happens that either raises the stakes, reveals to the audience something new, or both. Clint’s character is established as a good-hearted man, who’s willing to help everyone around him, which creates empathy between the audience and the character. But he has a major flaw: He was never there for his family when they needed him. This character arc is well executed and feels natural and emotionally satisfying.
The first half of the second act of the movie is successfully driven by Bradley Cooper’s character, a DEA agent starting an investigation that will eventually lead to Clint. Even though this is the antagonist, we have no trouble empathizing with him and, at times, we even wish him to succeed.
As the story progresses, Bradley gets closer to Clint. This leads to a moment where, ignoring his identity, he shares a breakfast with him, and even gets some family advice. This scene at a café creates powerful and delightful tension, as Bradley might discover Clint’s the criminal he’s been looking for for a long time.
Around the three-quarters of the film, Clint is faced by a dilemma. Dilemmas are a very useful devices, because it forces the character to make a decision and, therefore, show character, and because it makes the audience eager to know which decision will be it. Clint ends up choosing family, which helps completing his character arc.
The ending of the movie is very good. As mentioned before, the character arc is satisfying and how things turn out for Clint’s character feel right. Strangely, the ending leaves a subplot forgotten, as we never hear from the drug dealers again and never see them get their comeuppance.
Overall, the two things I enjoyed the most about the film were:
The conflict.: Every scene is charged with conflict and tension, such as when the officer stops Clint and his dog almost detects the cocaine. The movie never stays in the same place. It’s always on motion and things are always happening.
The relationship between the hero and antagonist: This movie is a textbook example of how the antagonist of the story is not necessary evil or hates the hero. It’s easy to empathize with both hero and antagonist, and they even empathize with each other those some great scenes where they interact with each other.
Thanks for reading,
The Screenplayer.
